Process for preparing phenylphosphonous dichloride

ABSTRACT

IT HAVING BEEN FOUND THAT A CRITICAL INTERDEPENDENCE EXISTS BETWEEN THESE FUNCTIONS IF HIGH YIELDS ARE TO BE ATTAINED. Recycling of byproduct diphenylphosphinous chloride can further increase yields.   WHEREIN Y represents a yield of at least 60%, t represents reaction time (hours) and the terms A and R include the reaction temperature and molar ratios of   SATISFY THE FORMULA:   PHOSPHORUS TRICHLORIDE (PC13), and elemental phosphorus under such conditions that the temperature of reaction, time of reaction, and the molar ratio of   Phenylphosphonous dichloride can be prepared in high yield in an autoclave process by reacting monochlorobenzene

United States Patent [1 1 Via et al.

[ 1 Feb. 4, 1975 PROCESS FOR PREPARING PHENYLPHOSPHONOUS DICHLORIDE [75] Inventors: Francis A. Via, Yorktown, N.Y.;

Eugene H. Uhing, Ridgewood, N.J.; Arthur D. F. Toy, Stamford, Conn.

[73] Assignee: Stauffer Chemical Company,

Westport, Conn.

221 Filed: Nov. 19,1973

2 11 Appl.No.:417,172

[52] U.S. Cl. 260/543 P [51] Int. Cl. C07f 9/52 [58] Field of Search 260/543 P [56] References Cited OTHER PUBLICATIONS Bliznyuk et al., Zhurnal Obshchei Kimii, Vol. 37, No. 4, Apr. 1962, pp. 840-841, of eng. ed.

Primary Examiner-Lorraine A. Weinberger Assistant Examiner-Richard D. Kelly phosphorus trichloride (PCl and elemental phosphorus under such conditions that the temperature of reaction, time of reaction, and the molar ratio of J/(Q'Cl) and (P)/(@c1) satisfy the formula:

y (t) B8 wherein Y represents a yield of at least 60%, l represents reaction time (hours) and the terms A and R include the reaction temperature and molar ratios of Pc1, (@-c1) and (Pvt Owl),

it having been found that a critical interdependence exists between these functions if high yields are to be attained. Recycling of byproduct diphenylphosphinous chloride can further increase yields.

12 Claims, N0 Drawings PROCESS FOR PREPARING t PI-IENYLPHOSPHONOUS DICIILORIDE The present invention relates to an improved process for preparing phenylphosphonous dichloride by the autoclave method.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Phenylphosphonous dichloride is a known chemical intermediate for phosphorus based insecticides. Extensive quantities are used each year which are presently being prepared by the hot tube process. As demands increase, so do the requirements for more efficient processes for preparing the same. In reviewing possible new procedures. it was noted that an autoclave process for preparing phenylphosphonous dichloride was suggested by Bliznyuk et al., Zhurnal Obshchei Kimii, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 890-892, April, 1967, E. 840. This process comprises the steps of reacting monochlorobenzene, phosphorus trichloride, elemental phosphorus and, optionally, an iodine catalyst in an autoclave under elevated pressure at temperatures of 320-340C. for 7 hours. However, only 47% yields are reported for the uncatalyzed reaction. In the presence of the iodine catalyst, yields increased only to 54.6%. These yields are insufficient in light of other known technology to make the process commercially practicable. If a catalyst is used, the cost of the catalyst and the separation of the catalyst from the product would further reduce the desirability of the process. German Patent l,945,645 shows the autoclave production of diphenylchlorophosphines.

Therefore, and in accordance with the present invention it has been found that the above described autoclave process can be utilized effectively even in the absence of a catalyst to provide phenylphosphonous dichloride in high yields.

THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, phenylphosphonous dichloride can be prepared in higher yields than heretofore known by the autoclave reaction by conducting the autoclave reaction between the monochlorobenzene, phosphorus trichloride and elemental phosphorus in such a manner as to maintain a specific relationship between the time of reaction, temperature and the ratios of phosphorus trichloride and elemental phosphorus to monochlorobenzene. Yields of 80-90% can be attained using the process of the present invention. It has also been found that yields can be further improved by recycling a byproduct of the reaction, diphenylphosphinous chloride, in a specific molar ratio to the monochlorobenzene used in the reaction. Yields of over 90% can be achieved by recycling.

It has been found that in the autoclave reaction be-- there is provided a new and critical method of prepar-.

ing phenylphosphonous dichloride such that high yields can be obtained. Additionally, it has been found that the reaction suffers from a competing product decomposition reaction which can be controlled by using the 2 proper conditions. Further, byproduct diphenylphosphinous chloride can be recycled to further increase yields. 4

TECHNICAL DISCUSSION In accordance with the present invention it has been found that the stated reaction between phosphorus tri chloride, monochlorobenzene, and phosphorus, if conducted in such a manner as to maintain a specified relationship between time (1), temperature (T). the molar ratio of (Polo/CH1),

i.e., (C), the molar ratio of ou/(G l),

i.e., (Z), and, if recycled diphenylphosphinous monochloride is present, the molar ratio of recycled diphenylphosphinous chloride to monochloro-benzene (Q) zeal/Q01,

will provide higher yields of phenylphosphonous dichloride than heretofore known in the autoclave process. This relationship can be expressed mathematically as follows:

(A) A/ t 3)(R)(t molar ratio Rec equals )2PC1/ c1 molar ratio Z equals molar ratio B equals 1.9559 B equals 0.0327 8:, equals 0.00674 B equals 215.26 B5 equals 0.508 8.; equals l47.39

B1 equals l5.23

B equals 87.46

Reducing the equation to its lowest form of unknowns, the following expression is obtained:

ln this expression, the only variables are yield (Y), time (1), temperature (T), ratio of (Pun/(G l),

i.e., (c) ratio of C)-)2Pc1/ -c1 (Rec) and ratio of i.e., (Z). The limits on these factors is as follows:

Time (I): from about one-fourth to about 30 hours Temperature (T): from about 275C. to about 400C.

Ratio (C): from about 0.6 to about 3.0

Yield (Y): 60% and up Rec: 0.0-0.2, 0.020. 2, more preferably 0045-0. 1 3.

Ratio (Z): from about 0.5 to about 2.0 and preferably about 0.6 to about 1.3, and more preferably 0.6-0.7, and most preferably 0.66.

It is to be pointed out that the amount of recycle present can actually vary from zero to an unlimited amount. Practically, the amount of recycle used is governed by the amount prepared in the previous batch as it would be uneconomical to prepare separately or purchase diphenylphosphinous chloride from an outside source and add it to the reaction though this can be done if desired. However, large excesses of recycle relative to the amount of PCI;, present are to be avoided to minimize residue formation.

It is to be pointed out that there are some possible inaccuracies in the formula which show up at the higher yields, and at higher temperatures. These deviations may be explainable by the heat history of the reaction. This is particularly true at the temperatures over 300C. since it may take one-half hour to raise the temperature from 300C. to 350C. and 15 minutes to cool the reaction to 300 C. Additional reaction and/or decomposition'during this period is therefore possible. While in general most of the data conforms to the formula, some variation is possible.

Since experimental error and/or heat history can cause variation in the percent yield calculated or actually obtained, the deviation between the calculated percent yield and the actual percent yield is broadly limited to a deviation i l8.0% preferably i 12.0% and more preferably 1 6.0% with the proviso that a yield of at least 60% yield is maintained and the yield of 100% is not exceeded.

The foregoing deviations are based on a statistically derived Standard Error of Estimate or SEE. The standard error of estimate or SEE relating to the formula of the present invention is 6.0% yield, assuming normally distributed error. Thus, and assuming an SEE of 6.0%, and a normally distributed degree of error, there is a 68% probability that yields obtained from the formula will be :6.0% yield. Statistically, at :t 12% deviation or 2 SEE, there is a probability that values obtained from the formula will fall within the deviation. At t l8% or 3 SEE, there is a 99% probability that the values will fall within the deviation. Standard Error of Estimate or SEE is an accepted statistical term and its computation is intended to be accomplished by the accepted formula for defining such term.

The reaction is conducted in the presence of yellow or white elemental phosphorus. The red form of phosphorus is less preferred as it has been found to be substantially inactive as compared to the yellow or white forms of phosphorus. Normal handling techniques to prevent spontaneous flammation are used.

Stoichiometrically, the reaction would appear to require at least 3 moles of monochlorobenzene and 2 moles of elemental phosphorus per mole of phosphorus trichloride. However, and in order to obtain increased yields, a specific excess of the phosphorus trichloride relative to the monochlorobenzene is required to obtain the proper molar ratio of 'as used in the formula. The elemental phosphorus is preferably used in an amount sufficient to provide about two-thirds moles elemental phosphorus per mole monochlorobenzene, i.e., the stoichiometric amount. The amount of phosphorus used is not critical other than to provide the minimum two-thirds mole elemental phosphorus per mole of monochlorobenzene. Lesser amounts can be used but this could be detrimental to the overall results of the reaction.

Excess elemental phosphorus can be used to increase the rate of reaction. However, excesses of elemental phosphorus over the stoichiometric amount of twothirds mole phosphorus per mole of monochlorobenzene are converted from yellow phosphorus to red phosphorus during the reaction. The red phosphorus is undesirable since it builds up excessively on the walls of the autoclave, thereby causing fouling of the autoclave. Red phosphorus is also entrained in the product stream and is not easily removed therefrom and may cause further buildup in subsequent processing equipment. Even though excess phosphorus can increase the reaction rate, excess is preferably not used for these reasons.

lf excess phosphorus is used, the red phosphorus The product of the present invention has utility as a chemical intermediate, particularly in preparing insecticides. lllustrative ofthis is the reaction of phenylphosphonous dichloride with sulfur to prepare benzene buildup on autocalve walls and in the product stream 5 phosphonothioic dicmoride can be eliminated by postchlorination. The phosphorus is changed to PCl which can be recycled. Chlorination is usually accomplished at elevated temperatures, for example, around 100C.

Since red phosphorus buildup can also occur using 10 the stoichiometric amount of elemental phosphorus (since some red phosphorus is formed during the reaction), chlorination can be effectively used to clean the autoclave. Effective cleaning of the autoclave can be s (-PC12 S lip-180C Gl followed by reacting the phenylphosphonothioic dichloride with ethanol and p-nitrophenol in the presence of a base to prepare O-ethyl, O-p-nitrophenyl effected by draining the autoclave and adding about phenylphosphonothioate (EPN):

% by volume PCl Chlorine is added and the system heated to about 100C. The red phosphorus and chlorine form PCI which can remain in the autoclave and be used for the next batch.

The improved process of the present invention is carried out at elevated temperature and at least at autogenus pressure. Temperatures of between about 275C. and about 400C. can be used and preferably between about 300C. and about 350C. are utilized in the reaction. The process may be conveniently effected by introducing the reactants into a reaction zone capable of withstanding elevated pressure, such as a metal bomb, autoclave, or other pressure vessel and carrying out the reaction under at least the autogenus pressure developed by the reactants at the reaction temperatures. Pressures of up to about 200 atmospheres above the autogenus pressure (about 25-75 atmospheres) can also be used but are less desirable due to the type of equipment required to hold such pressures. The pressure vessel should be equipped with an agitation mechanism (rocker, stirrer or vibrator) for best results. The time ofthe reaction can vary between about one-fourth hour and about 30 hours and preferably about one-half cation of products is achieved by conventional methods such as, but not necessarily limited to, elemental analysis and gas chromatography for purity and mass spectrometer and nuclear magnetic resonance (phosphorus) (NMR) and infrared analysis to establish struc- 5 ture.

s base T Et QJPLCIZ acoruao-(Q-avo2 a known pesticide.

The invention is illustrated in the Examples which follow.

EXAMPLES ln a 300 cubic centimeter 316 stainless steel rocking autoclave were placed monochlorobenzene, phosphorus trichloride and phosphorus. While under rocking agitation, the autoclave was slowly heated up to reaction temperature and the heating maintained over a specified period of time. After cooling, the autoclave was opened and the contents of the autoclave were placed in a distillation flask. The contents of the flask were distilled under vacuum and the product separated. In each of the following runs 9 gms (0.30 moles) of elemental phosphorus, and 50 gms (0.45 moles) of monochlorobenzene was used. The amount of phosphorus trichloride was varied to provide the necessary ratio of as noted by the letter C" in the data. Each sample required about 0.75l .0 hours to heat up to about 300C. Approximately 6 minutes was required to raise the temperature each additional 10C. All samples were purified by distillation and each distillation fraction was analyzed by a gas chromatographic method.

The following results were obtained showing the de- 5 viation from the calculated value:

I A B L E I EXAMPLE TEMP TIME (PCl Cl) REC YIELD YIELD DIFFER- NO. (T) (t). RATIO (C) OBSERVED CALC. ENCE l 305 16.00 1. 48 0. 000 78. O0 81. 71 3. 71 2 305 14.00 1. 44 0. 000 79 00 78 .65 0 35 1 3 300 10.00 1.50 0. 000 50. 00 60.06 10 06 4 302 7 .00 l. 37 0. 000 45 00 51. 01 6. 01 5 325 9. l. 29 0.000 80. 0O 83. 53 3. 53

TABLE l-Continued EXAMPLE TEMP TIME (PCl3/( C -C1) REC YIELD YIELD DJIil-EEl't (t)- RATIO (0) OBSERVED CALC. ENCE 6 343 4.00 1.50 0.000 81.00 79.15 1.85 7 320 4. 00 l. 47 0. 000 74. 00 71.54 2. 46 8 320 19. 00 l. 44 0.000 88. 00 87 64 0 36 9 320 2.00 1.57 0. 000 58. 0O 52 01 5. 99 10 345 l. 00 l. 49 0. 000 68. 00 72. 02 4 02 11 297 9. 80 l. 48 0. 000 52 00 51. 0. 85 12 350 0. 50 l. 44 0. 000 68. 00 65.26 2 .74 13 300 15. 00 0. 33 0.000 44. 00 40. 87 3. l3 14 300 14. 00 0. 72 0. 000 63. 00 59 .92 3. 08 15 300 15. 50 l. 06 0. 000 73. 00 69 32 3. 68 16 350 3. 50 l. 45 0. 000 69 O0 74 39 5. 39 17 350 2.50 l. 45 O. 000 74. 00 75. 85 l. 85 18 355 l. 66 l. 50 0. 000 82. 00 74. 38 7- 62 19 358 1.50 l. 44 0.000 81. 00 72. 35 8. 65 20 300 9. 00 l. 47 0. 000 50. 00 55.98 5. 98 21 355 2.00 1. 49 0. 000 79. 00 73.71 5.29 22 350 3. 00 l. 45 0. 000 68. 00 75.22 7 .22 23 350 8. 00 l. 47 0. 000 60.00 65.06 5 06 24 350 5.00 l. 44 0 000 79. 00 71. 33 7 .67 25 350 4 80 1.53 0. 000 74. 00 72. 49 l. 51 26 355 1.75 0. 66 0. 000 61. 00 60.34 0. 66 27 347 l. 50 l. 02 0. 000 66.00 70. 90 4.90 28 350 l. 50 l. 0. 000 69. 00 74. 33 5. 33 29 300 14 .00 2. 76 0. 000 88. 00 76. 28 11.72 30 350 1.50 l. 88 0. 000 68. 00 78 63 10 63 31 300 ll. 20 l. 04 0. 086 65. 00 65 53 0 53 32 300 15. 00 l. 07 0.084 78 .00 75. 05 2.95 33 300 15. 50 0. 76 0. 104 70 00 7O 92 0. 92 34 360 l. 00 O. 74 0 106 68. 00 71. 86 3. 86 35 350 2. 00 l. 04 0 .126 82. 00 84 61 2. 61 36 350 1.25 l. 23 0. 067 79 00 80 02 l. 02 37 358 l. 00 1.46 0. 058 88. 00 79 63 8. 37

As can be seen from the data, various combinations 40 78% yield of phenylphosphonous dichloride. This is a of time (I), temperature (T), and mole ratio (C) can be used to provide yields of above 80%, above 70%, and above 60%. This data clearly shows the critical interdependence of these three factors. The data also show that heating too long at any one temperature can affect product yield. In Example 17, a 74% yield is obtained after heating a reaction mixture ofa mole ratio 1.45 to a temperature of 350C. temperature and a mole ratio of 1.47 and 8.0 hours, only a 60% yield is obtained. The ratio is also important as can be seen by comparing Examples 29, 2, and 14 as well as Examples 15 and 13. The variation in the concentration ratio of the phosphorus trichloride to the monochlorobenzene under any specific set time or temperature conditions can vary the yield by as much as 25%. These data show the critical interdependence of the three variables in attaining high yields.

The effectiveness of recycling the byproduct diphenyl phosphinous chloride to increase product yield is also shown by these data. In Example 15 run at 300C. for 15.5 hours at a concentration ratio of 1.06 and no recycle, there is obtained an actual yield of phenylphosphonous dichloride of 73%. In Example 32 run at 300C. for 15 hours at a concentration ratio of 1.07 and a recycle ratio of 0.084 there is obtained a 5% increase in yield. A comparison of Examples 28 (69% yield with no recycle) and 36 (79% yield with recycle) shows a 10% increase in yield with recycle even though a slightly shorter reaction time and slightly lower concentration ratio were used in the recycle experiment.

Further evidence of the effectiveness of the invention can be shown in the following computer generated data wherein a set temperature was used in the calculations and the molar ratio of i.e., (C) was set out in four specific groupings of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. The molar ratio of (Pi/(gel),

i.e., (Z), was held constant at two-thirds mole of elemental phosphorus per mole of monochlorobenzene. As can be seen from the presented data, considerable variation occurs between time and yield assuming a constant temperature and molar ratio (C).

TABLE 11 TEMP. MOLAR RATIO C=0.5 C=l.0 C=1.5 C=2.0

TIME (Hrs) YlELD YIELD" YlELD* YlELD Predicted As can be seen from these data and particularly in connection with the elevated temperature data, the reaction reaches a maximum point after which yields fall off. This is due to a side reaction which degrades the product. 11" high, yields are to be obtained, the reaction must be halted at the point of highest yield and not allowed to proceed or else product yield suffers.

Also, computer generated data show the effectiveness of the recycling of byproduct diphenylphosphinous chloride. Using a set temperature and time, and a varying molar ratio of i.e., (C), there is shown greater predicted yields using the recycle than that obtained when the recycle is not used.

i.e., (C), is increased. This is to correspond to actual experimental results wherein it was observed that as the ratio of i.e., (C), is increased, the amount of diphenylphosphinous chloride formed is decreased. In order to approximate the amount of recycle which would remain from a preceeding batch, hence recycle, a lesser amount was used in the computations as the ratio of (PClg) @cl) was increased.

The amount of elemental phosphorus used in the reaction has an effect on the reaction rate. Stoichiometrically, about two-thirds mole elemental phosphorus is required per mole of monochlorobenzene. Excess elemental phosphorus over the 2/3 mole (P)/ mole Q0 will provide increased reaction rates as shown in the following data:

* Z held constant at 2/3 mole elemental phosphorus per mole monochlorobenzene TABLE-IV EXAMPLE No. 38 39' 40 41 42 43 Monochlorobenzene' 0. 45 0. 43 45 0. 44 0. 45 45 Phosphorus Trichloride 0. 66 O 64 0. 65 O. 65 0 .66 0 65 Elemental Phosphorus 0. 29 0.29 53 0.30 0 .29 0 6 0 (P)/(- Cl) mole ratio (Z) 0.64 0. 67 l. 18 0. 68 O 64 l. 33

% Excess Phosphorus 0 0 83% 0 0 100% Time (hours) 0.5 1.0 0.5 1o 16 Q Temperature (C. 342 345 342 300 300 293 Yield 58 74 76 52 78 73 cum/vi 1411011 c]. m. 86 87 67 9t; 86

Calculated Yield 55 72 Q 67 51 82 68 based on normalized Z values of examples 38, 39, 41, and 42.

As can be seen from the preceeding data, the use of an 83% excess amount of elemental phosphorus can almost double the reaction rate, i.e., cutting the reaction time in half. Reaction rate increases are also shown in o excess above 2/3 mole (P)/ mole (@Cl).

.66 relative to After cooling, the autoclave was opened and 145 grams of material was poured from the autoclave. 142 grams was poured into a distillation flask for product isolation. Upon distillation the following results were obusing 100% excess elemental phosphorus. The data tained: shows that reaction temperatures even can be slightly lowered while still obtaining effective rates and yields.

C tN Li uid Vapor Pressure Yield EXAMPLE 44 u 0 Tem:.(C.) Temp (C.) (mm) (gms) In a dry 300 cubic centimeter 316 stainless steel s-:28 321:? gzp g3 rocking autoclave purged with nitrogen were placed 3 80420 g the following reagent Residue 3 Grams Moles PCl3 90 0.66

P (yellow) 9 0.29

Mole ratio of PCl3/ -c1 (c) 0. 66/0.44S 1. 48

Mole ratio of P @c1 (2) 0.29 o 445 o.

Temperature Timc 2010 275C. )0 minutes heating time 275C. minutes (held). l |(l,l l S('. l1 hours (held).

('uulcd to room temperature.

Gas chromatographic analysis showed Cut No. l to be principally PC], with a trace of chlorobenzene.

Cut No. 2 was the desired phenylphosphonous dichloride product m, 1.5957 (same index of refraction as commercial sample of the same material).

Cut No. 3, as analyzed by gas chromatography,

,5 showed about a 50/50 mixture of phenylphosphonous dichloride and diphenylphosphinous chloride Yields PCl 68 grams (0.496m) Product 63. gram (0.352 m) 97% excess 81% on P charged 79% on Q-Cl charged EXAMPLE 45 Using the same procedure as in Example 44 the following materials were charged:

The reaction mixture was heated at 300C. for 7 hours. The product was isolated by distillation. Yield of phenylphosphonous dichloride was 17.5 grams or 24.5% based on chlorobenzene charged. Yield based on phosphorus charged was 32%. lnsufficient time and- /or temperature and/or reactants contributed to the low yield.

The invention is defined in the claims which follow.

What is claimed is:

1. In a method for preparing phenylphosphonous dichloride by the reaction of monochlorobenzene, phosphorus trichloride and elemental phosphorus substan tially all in the yellow or white form in an autoclave, the improvement which comprises reacting said reactants at a temperature (T) within the range of from about 275C. to about 400C. for a period of time (t) of from about one-fourth hour to about 30 hours using a concentration of phosphorus trichloride, phosphorus, and chlorobenzene in amounts sufficient to provide a molar ratio (C) of within the range of from about 0.6 and about 3, and a molar ratio (Z) of elemental phosphorus to said chlorobenzene within the range of from about 0.5 to about 2.0, said temperature, time and molar ratios being selected in such a manner sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the formula:

wherein Y equals yield based on the amount of charged chlorobenzene and phosphorus relative to the ratio of t equals time in hours A equals (E)(C)/[(E /100B1) C] R equa|s (Z) [1018 B 41-30011] E equals B4 B5 (T-300) B (Rec) T equals temperature in degrees centigrade C equals molar ratio Rec equals )2Pc1/-c1 molar ratio Z equals )/(Cl) I molar ratio B equals 1.9556

B equals 0.0327

3;; equals 0.00674 8. equals 215.26

B5 equals 0.508

8 equals 147.39

81 equals 15.23

8,. equals 87.46 wherein the time, temperature and molar ratios are selected to provide a yield of at least 60% or higher, said formula having a confidence limit of i 18.0% on the percent yield with the proviso that the yield be at least 60%.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the temperature is within the range of from about 300C. to about 350C, the time is within the range of from about one-half hour to about 14 hours and the molar ratio is about 1.0.

3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein Y is at least 4. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein Y is at least 5. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the ratio of as labeled Rec is between about 0.02 and about 0.2.

6. The method as recited in claim 5 wherein Rec is between about 0.045 and about 0.13.

7. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the confidence limits are i 12%.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the confidence limits are i: 6%.

ratio (C) is 1.04, recycle (Rec) is 0.126, yield is 82.0%, and deviation is 2.6l%.

10. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the ratio of labeled as Z is from about 0.6 to about 11. The method as recited in claim 10 wherein said ratio Z is 0.66.

12. The method of claim 1 which includes the further step of post-chlorinating the reaction mixture to remove red phosphorus.

Q UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRMEEMARK UFFICE QETEFECAT F CETEN PATENT N0. 3,86%,594 DATED February t, 1975 O IN EN G) I Francis A. Via; Eugene H. U'hing & Arthur D. F. Toy

It is certified that error appears in the ab0ve-irtenttfied patent and that said Letters Pa ent are hereby corrected as shown below:

Page 1, References Cited, line 5, l9 6 2 should read 9 7 LB B (T-5oo Column 2, line 41, "R equals (Z) 110 should [5 +13 (T-5 0017 Q read R equals (Z)(l0 --7 Column 5, line 39, after "0.0-0.2; insert preferably f Column 7, line #8, after 550C. insert for 2.5 hours.

But in Example 25, using 250C. --7 Column 9, line 5, Table II, Under TlME(Hrs)" ins e rt 5 -7 Q t LB B (T500l/ Column l t, line 5, R equals (2)410 and r 113 B (T3oo insert R equals (Z)(l0 e Engncd and Scaled this ninth a O S t D y f 8;) ember 1975 Arrest:

RUTH c. MIA-SON c. MARSHALL DANN Anestmg Commissioner uj'PaIents and Trademarks 

1. IN A METHOD FOR PREPARING PHENYLPHOSPHONOUS DICHLORIDE BY THE REACTION OF MONOCHLOROBENZENE, PHOSPHORUS TRICHLORIDE AND ELEMENTAL PHOSPHORUS SUBSTANTIALLY ALL IN THE YELLOW OR WHITE FORM IN AN AUTOCLAVE, THE IMPROVEMENT WHICH COMPRISES REACTING SAID REACTANTS AT A TEMPERATURE (T) WITHIN THE RANGE OF FROM ABOUT 275*C. TO ABOUT 400*C. FOR A PERIOD OF TIME (T) OF FROM ABOUT ONE-FOURTH HOUR TO ABOUT 30 HOURS USING A CONCENTRATION OF PHOSPHORUS TRICHLORIDE, PHOSPHORUS, AND CHLOROBENZENE IN AMOUNTS SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE A MOLAR RATIO (C) OF
 2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the temperature is within the range of from about 300*C. to about 350*C., the time is within the range of from about one-half hour to about 14 hours and the molar ratio is about 1.0.
 3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein Y is at least 70%.
 4. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein Y is at least 80%.
 5. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the ratio of
 6. The method as recited in claim 5 wherein Rec is between about 0.045 and about 0.13.
 7. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the confidence limits are + or - 12%.
 8. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the confidence limits are + or - 6%.
 9. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein temperature (T) is 350*C., time (t) is 2 hours,
 10. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the ratio of
 11. The method as recited in claim 10 wherein said ratio Z is 0.66.
 12. The method of claim 1 which includes the further step of post-chlorinating the reaction mixture to remove red phosphorus. 